Before the pandemic was declared (back when the world was predictable) I’d taken time off from work to go to Washington DC with my son, a college senior. We planned to visit an FBI agent who was also a dear high school friend. She’d kindly arranged for my son to meet with her colleagues to share their job experiences. Emerging from the long North Country winter, I looked forward to the warmer weather I knew we’d enjoy just a few hours south of us. Mostly I was happy to spend a rare long weekend with my son. Like many thwarted plans, though, my trip was cancelled.
When I finally conceded that DC wouldn’t happen I informed my job I’d be available to work those days. But, despite the chaos of urban areas hard-hit by coronavirus, business is actually slow in many rural primary care offices. Few patients show up for in-person visits. There are no work physicals to be done (people aren’t working), no sports physicals (sports are cancelled), no pre-operative clearances (elective surgeries have been rescheduled). People are (rightfully) not coming in for routine diabetic or hypertension checks. They aren’t getting bloodwork or mammograms either.
In short, my services were not needed in my office (which, I know, seems incredible as doctors collapse from exhaustion enduring grueling shifts just a few hours away). Although the pace has slowed for many offices, doctors are still quite busy trying to stay on top of ever-changing guidelines, remotely attending frequent meetings, and worrying (like the rest of the world) as they struggle to find ways to ease their patients’ suffering. While necessary, these tasks are generally not revenue-producing.
So, I found myself with an unplanned long weekend at home doing not much of anything except deliberately avoiding the news (I highly recommend this). It was a lovely respite (and only just mildly guilt-producing). Also, I knew I was fortunate and that my job would be waiting for me Monday.
Although America is facing an unprecedented public health crisis, healthcare workers are actually being furloughed from their jobs. Many of those lucky enough to still be working have taken pay cuts in an effort to offset huge economic losses – a sacrifice most willingly make to ensure the continued care of their patients and the survival of their hospitals. Although ERs and ICUs overflow with COVID patients in heavily populated areas, nationwide hospital volumes are down.
Many people who actually need an urgent evaluation are afraid to seek care. Even I am hesitant to recommend urgent care or ER visits when I’m on call. Doctors are doing a lot of phone triaging and empiric treatment (with pleas to patients to reach back out if they aren’t improving with the telephone assessment and treatment). The result is predictable. Rural hospitals, highly dependent financially on outpatient services, are in danger of closing. Money funneled by Congress in a desperate effort to repair gaping holes in the tattered safety net may not be enough to save them.
But hospitals aren’t the only health care entity in danger. Despite the well known fact that the United States has long suffered from a primary care shortage, physician practices are actually closing. The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) wrote to a letter to the House and Senate this month requesting “dramatic interventions” to prevent further closures and “bold steps to repair the damage“ already done. In the letter the AAFP stated that “the current fee-for-service structure puts the primary care delivery system one pandemic away from complete collapse.” Their assessment of our system’s fragility and the impact on patients was bleak: as primary health care goes, so will the health of Americans.
To add insult to injury, as more Americans lose their jobs they also lose employee-based insurance benefits. I’m hopeful that the current crisis will force Americans to reconsider their opposition to universal health care. In an article written for Vox this past week, Dylan Scott wrote passionately about the “fundamental immorality” of the US healthcare system. “The flaws in America’s health system have been evident for decades to anyone who cared to look, but the coronavirus pandemic has left no room for doubt: People will die because the US refuses to treat health care as a public good and a universal right. They already are.”
People will die.
In anticipation of returning to work this past week, I decided to catch up on what I’d missed during my blissful news-free staycation at home. I sat down at my computer last Sunday night and scrolled through the news. The headlines were shocking: the president threatened to defund the World Health Organization (in the middle of a pandemic!) and Americans were protesting stay-at-home orders.
It seemed unreal – the government wanted to take away funds from the one global organization dedicated to assist in worldwide health emergencies? How could this be? A public health crisis of this magnitude requires a coordinated international response. According to their website, WHO “works worldwide to promote health, keep the world safe, and serve the vulnerable.” Their purpose is to:
-
- prevent emergencies and support development of tools necessary during outbreaks
- detect and respond to acute health emergencies
- support delivery of essential health services in fragile settings.
These seem like pretty necessary tasks during a pandemic.
I also read about protests. As the virus continued to spread many states tightened or prolonged their restrictions. Some Americans balked at what they felt was an infringement on their rights. In a not-so-funny tweet, Comedian Patton Oswalt wrote, “Anne Frank spent 2 years hiding in an attic and we’ve been home for just over a month with Netflix, food delivery & video games and there are people risking viral death by storming state capital buildings & screaming, ‘Open Fuddruckers!’”
It’s clear that many Americans faithfully practice social isolation and that doing so is particularly challenging for people who live paycheck to paycheck. Staying home may not be a viable option when it impacts ability to feed a family or pay rent. Although some small businesses have become creative in their offerings, it’s also clear that many will be forced to close. Living in a small community, it’s heartbreaking to learn of friends and neighbors losing their livelihood. While financial struggles are an understandable reason to want to open up sooner, conspiracy theories, boredom and “un-American” arguments are not.
Still, despite the protests, apparently many Americans are willing to prolong their efforts at social distancing.
Meanwhile, we see frightened (and angry) health care workers plead on social media for people to stay home as they tearfully describe mentally exhausting shifts fighting an unseen villain in gear that is challenging to wear for a few minutes, much less hours on end – obstructing face shields and hard-to-breath-in “disposable” masks that are re-worn. How long can this go on?
The answer seems to depend on our willingness to make sacrifices now.
In a New York Times article by Donald McNeil Jr published earlier this week, former president of the National Academy of Medicine Dr Harvey Fineberg makes grim projections. “We face a doleful future. Exactly how the pandemic will end depends in part on medical advances still to come. It will also depend on how individual Americans behave in the interim. If we scrupulously protect ourselves and our loved ones, more of us will live. If we underestimate the virus, it will find us.”
It will find us.
The article points out that COVID is currently the leading cause of death in America (surpassing heart disease and cancer) with more than 1,800 American deaths a day since April 7. Future projections by various experts predict deaths ranging from 1.7 to 2.2 million by the fall if we are unable to stop the spread (we are swiftly approaching a million now). For perspective, the article cites that 420,000 Americans died in World War II. Obviously the true death rate will depend both on how overwhelmed hospitals are and the percentage of the population that is actually tested (since without adequate testing we can’t know how deadly a virus truly is).
Most experts agree that until there is a vaccine to prevent further spread (or advanced treatment options for those already infected) it simply isn’t safe for people to stop isolating. The tighter the isolation now, the fewer deaths and the longer the periods between lockdowns. Harvard Public School of Health predicts that without increased critical care capacity or the development of a vaccine intermittent such distancing may be required into 2022 along with intensive surveillance through 2024. They cautioned that if social distancing restrictions are lifted the virus will quickly resurge.
In an article in Time this week, the Japanese island of Hokkaido painted a distressing picture of what will happen if restrictions are lifted too soon. After calling off isolation a second wave of infections were even higher than the first, forcing the island back into lockdown. I’ve also read that China didn’t reopen cities until intensive testing found zero new cases for 14 straight days. Due to a lack of test kits, the United States isn’t performing surveillance anywhere close to this intensity. Still, daily reports clearly indicate that we are not there now.
And yet this week (possibly in response to protests as elections loom in the near future) some states started loosening their restrictions. Preliminary data from these states suggests that this isn’t a good idea.
So, during a deadly pandemic healthcare workers are being laid off, America is de-funding an organization created to handle such a global health crisis, citizens are protesting the requirement to stay home and some states are conceding to these demands. All of these actions not only risk lives through direct spread and overwhelming our health care system but they also potentially increase the overall time we will need to spend in isolation.
What can we do?
We should channel our outrage toward making positive changes. The vulnerability of our healthcare system is absurdly evident. In the AAFP letter to government leaders, Board Chair Dr. John Cullen wrote “This public health crisis has identified significant cracks in our country’s primary care infrastructure. Population health will only be achieved when we identify and remove the barriers that exist.” The greatest barrier is the lack of access to healthcare. Health care must be a guaranteed American right (not an employee benefit). This has become painfully obvious as hard-working Americans lose their jobs and find themselves without coverage during a global health crisis.
We also need to fund agencies that advance public health. Recent cuts to the CDC as well as the proposed defunding of WHO will not save money in the long run. Instead, these actions will cost lives and make it difficult (if not impossible) to anticipate and react to a future crisis.
We must protect our frontline healthcare workers. As hard as it can be, our efforts at physical isolation do save lives. An article this week in CNN quoted the director of the CDC Robert Redfield explaining that social distancing is “one of the most powerful weapons” against COVID-19, “If we can just maximize that social distancing, we can limit this virus’s ability.”
The good news is that most Americans (regardless of their political affiliation) are up to this task.
There are other ways to help, too. Support your local businesses in any way you can. Check in on your neighbors. And, if you’ve recovered from COVID by at least 2 weeks, you can donate plasma to help in treatment of coronavirus patients. Go to the Red Cross website for more information: www.redcrossblood.org/plasma4covid.
Finally, one last message that may have been lost in coronavirus mania. People still experience health emergencies during a pandemic. Chest pain, arm weakness or severe headaches are potentially deadly and need to be treated as such. Fear of contracting coronavirus in a waiting room shouldn’t prevent seeking care when that care is necessary. If you aren’t sure, call your doctor. Despite advising patients not to be evaluated in the office if unnecessary (for their own safety), most doctors are still physically in their offices.
Telemedicine is convenient, especially for my elderly patients who have trouble getting rides from busy family members to their appointments. Telemedicine is often adequate for routine complaints and reviewing tests (and for triage to determine if a patient really needs an in-person evaluation). Telemedicine is likely here to stay, which I believe is a positive result of the pandemic. Of course, telemedicine can never fully replace office visits. There is still value in human touch, even if it is must be (temporarily) delayed. Or when it takes place through gloves.